The hottest Internet of things may wish to slow do

  • Detail

The "weaving" of the IOT may as well slow down.

in 2010, the IOT moved forward rapidly. Capital, market, government and scientific research all worked hard to weave. It can be said that the world is prosperous and beneficial; The world is bustling with things (). IOT has begun to be heavily written in the development plans of local governments. In the fields of power, transportation, logistics and so on, with some long-standing IOT embryonic forms, after long-term exploration and discovery, IOT has been included in the key areas of the 12th Five Year Plan

the China IOT research and development center predicts that the scale of China's IOT industry market will be 200billion yuan in 2010. By 2015, the overall market scale of China IOT will reach 750billion yuan, with an annual compound growth rate of more than 30%. The market investment prospect is huge

align the pace of top-level layout

different from the vertical division of general fields, IOT is a horizontal field, with the characteristics of strong discipline comprehensiveness, long industrial chain and wide penetration range. The demand of IOT in China mainly exists in smart electricity, transportation energy and logistics, home, environment and safety testing, medical health, fine agriculture and animal husbandry, industry and automatic control, national defense and military, finance and service industries. Although IOT applications can be everywhere, they are still dominated by local closed-loop applications and government led project applications, and there are relatively few applications across industries, departments and long application chains

at present, the development of IOT lacks top-level design and overall planning at the national level. There are obvious differences in the understanding of the definition, connotation and industrial scope of IOT among regions and departments, and the situation of blindly following the trend and rushing into mass action is relatively prominent. Institutional obstacles such as industrial monopoly, segmentation and self-contained system restrict the combination and benign interaction of IOT technology, industry and application; The fragmentation caused by administrative decentralization weakens the ability of strategic emerging industries to cooperate and tackle key problems

some cities lack a clear judgment on the development law and essence of IOT, and entrust system solutions such as urban informatization to multinational companies. At present, it has occupied the space for independent innovation and development of China's IOT industry and the market share of local enterprises, and also brought information security problems. The development of IOT is not only a technical issue, but also involves political, legal and national security issues. Only when laws, regulations and policies are perfect, can IOT deepen its development

when they rush, it is easy to lose the adjustment of long-term planning and strategic direction. Some experts suggested that a high-level official industry university research alliance should be established to organize and guide; Under the principle of maximizing national interests, we should achieve overall control over the development of IOT, and use regional and industrial characteristics to guide differentiated development

up to now, there are still many supporters of the IOT foam theory. It is not important to discuss whether it is a foam, because the concept of IOT is still in the process of development, and its development period will take 10 or even 20 years. Therefore, during the 3-5-year preparation warm-up period, it is necessary to adjust the pace, take a long-term view, and deploy with a long-term vision, causing groundwater pollution and land scarcity

hardware should be tough

in terms of technology, the foundation and core technology of IOT are still very lacking. The convenience of introducing technology has led to the lack of accumulation of core basic technology in China to a certain extent. Our sensor design and manufacturing industry is almost blank, and it is likely to become the dumping object of foreign businessmen who control almost the entire sensor market. Take the embedded system as an example, its hardware depends on foreign technology, and there is a big gap between chips, platform software and development tools. 95% of the embedded CPU depends on imports. In embedded operating systems, databases, development tools and other platform software, foreign brands occupy an absolute advantage

the IOT three-tier architecture is divided into sensing, transmission and application. The first explosion will be the demand of the sensing layer, which puts forward some requirements for hardware that domestic manufacturers cannot meet. Although the RFID industry chain has initially taken shape, there is still a gap in technology and enterprise strength with developed countries. The energy consumption and required space of UHF and active RFID have not formed an overall industrial capacity, and the independent intellectual property rights of tag chips are poor

in addition, the factor restricting the development of IOT industry is the lack of a unified standard system and a mature business model. At present, the standards are still scattered, missing and inconsistent, and the combination of standard formulation and market application is insufficient, as well as the integration with international standards. Only by finding a suitable business model and guiding civil demand, can we realize the benign transformation from government investment to social investment

Copyright © 2011 JIN SHI